1. Policy, Scope, and Underlying Assumptions
(1) Policy
JSR introduced environmental accounting in FY1999 with the following two objectives
- To strive to quantify the amount of resources invested into the environment and implement sound measures for the environment.
- To publish environmental accounting and increase corporate transparency.
(2) Scope
JSR Corporation - JSR Head Office, Yokkaichi Plant, Chiba Plant, Kashima Plant, Yokkaichi Research Laboratories, Tsukuba Research Laboratories, and Nagoya Branch
(3) Target Period
April 1, 2019 - March 31, 2020
(4) Underlying Assumptions regarding Aggregation and Calculation
- Calculations are performed in accordance with the Environmental Accounting Guidelines, 2005 edition (Ministry of the Environment) and environmental guidelines used in the chemical industry (issued by the Japan Chemical Industry Association and the Japan Responsible Care Council).
- While the calculation of costs was based mainly on actual results, the calculation of some expenses was based on underlying assumptions.
- Economic effects were substantial and did not include conversions of risk aversion effects or deemed effects into monetary amounts.
2. Environmental Protection Costs
(Unit: one million yen)
Classification |
Content of main activities Figures in parentheses express millions of yen. |
Investment |
Expense |
FY2018 |
FY2019 |
FY2018 |
FY2019 |
(1) Business area costs |
|
1,022 |
718 |
4,515 |
4,512 |
Breakdown |
(1)-1 Pollution prevention costs |
Investments: Wastewater treatment facility maintenance, etc.
Expenses: Air pollution prevention maintenance and management, etc. |
743 |
544 |
1,823 |
1,935 |
(1)-2 Global environmental protection costs |
Investments: Major on-site power generation equipment upgrades, etc.
Expenses: Routine on-site power generation equipment maintenance, etc. |
94 |
69 |
975 |
929 |
(1)-3 Resource circulation costs |
Investments: Sludge dryer system improvement, etc.
Expenses: Industrial waste recycling, disposal, etc. |
185 |
104 |
1,717 |
1,648 |
(2) Upstream/downstream costs |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
(3) Management activity costs |
Expenses: Environmental load monitoring, ISO 14001 maintenance and operation, etc. |
25 |
38 |
502 |
522 |
(4) Research and development costs |
Expenses: Development of environmentally friendly products, tests for legal applications, etc. |
0 |
0 |
1,116 |
1,645 |
(5) Social activity costs |
Expenses: Donations to environmental protection organizations, support for ICETT, etc. |
0 |
0 |
47 |
49 |
(6) Environmental pollution response costs |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Total |
1,047 |
756 |
6,180 |
6,728 |
* The table is slidable aside.
3. Environmental Protection Effects
Effect |
Index |
Unit |
FY2018 |
FY2019 |
Difference*1 |
Related information |
Environmental effects related to resources used in business activities |
Total energy consumption (crude oil equivalent) |
kL |
269,400 |
251,100 |
-18,300 |
For more information |
Use of resources designated under PRTR Act |
tons |
725,700 |
632,800 |
-92,900 |
For more information |
Water consumption |
1,000m3 |
15,300 |
14,900 |
-400 |
For more information |
Environmental protection effects related to environmental impact and waste emitted from business activities |
GHG emissions |
tons |
666,100 |
624,900 |
-41,200 |
For more information |
SOx emissions |
tons |
4 |
4 |
0 |
For more information |
NOx emissions |
tons |
308 |
303 |
-5 |
For more information |
PRTR substance emissions |
tons |
98 |
126 |
28 |
For more information |
Total amount of wastewater |
1,000m3 |
12,500 |
11,300 |
-1,200 |
For more information |
Chemical Oxygen Demand emissions |
tons |
479 |
404 |
-75 |
For more information |
Total nitrogen emissions |
tons |
128 |
145 |
17 |
For more information |
Total phosphorus emissions |
tons |
1 |
1 |
0 |
For more information |
Waste materials from plants |
tons |
20,300 |
23,400 |
3,100 |
For more information |
Off-site recycling |
tons |
20,000 |
22,700 |
2,700 |
For more information |
Reduced volume of waste treated off-site |
tons |
239 |
764 |
525 |
For more information |
Waste materials from plants disposed of by landfill |
tons |
0 |
0 |
0 |
For more information |
PRTR materials transported |
tons |
328 |
338 |
10 |
For more information |
Other environmental effects |
Products transported |
million ton-kilometer |
514 |
434 |
-80 |
For more information |
During transport GHG emissions |
tons |
24,200 |
20,200 |
-4,000 |
For more information |
Number of environmental complaints (Odor, noise, and vibration) |
cases |
0 |
0 |
0 |
For more information |
* The table is slidable aside.
*1 Improvement from previous years has not been corrected in terms of the production volume.
4. Economical Effects of Environmental Protection Measures
-Substantial Effect-
(Unit: million yen)
Effect (for one year) |
Benefit |
FY2018 |
FY2019 |
Cost reduction |
By saving energy |
75 |
185 |
By saving resources |
124 |
119 |
By treating waste on-site |
343 |
985 |
Total |
542 |
1,289 |
5. Consolidated Accounting
(Unit: one million yen)
|
Investments |
Expense |
Benefit |
FY2018 |
FY2019 |
FY2018 |
FY2019 |
FY2018 |
FY2019 |
JSR |
1,047 |
756 |
6,181 |
6,728 |
542 |
1,289 |
Domestic Group companies total |
363 |
81 |
2,241 |
2,066 |
194 |
187 |
Total*2 |
1,410 |
837 |
8,422 |
8,794 |
736 |
1,476 |
* The table is slidable aside.
*2 Total of JSR Corporation and 8 JSR Group companies