Sitemap

EnvironmentClimate Change Mitigation

1. Philosophy

Environmental problems attributable global warming (e.g., forest fires, droughts, water shortages, rising sea levels, threats of extinction, and impacts on ecosystems) are occurring on a global scale. Such problems are also seen in Japan. They are represented by floods caused by torrential rains, health problems such as heatstroke that result from more and more days of extreme heat, and such impacts on the ecosystems as coral bleaching.
JSR Group recognizes this as an important issue. Therefore, with the aim of helping realize a low-carbon society, we strive to lower our GHG emissions by, for example, reducing the amount of energy needed in the various processes of producing and supplying our products.

Amid a global trend whereby businesses are managing GHG (Scope 1 to 3) indirectly emitted from their supply chains and disclosing their emissions, JSR Group calculates and ascertains its emissions based on the Basic Guidelines on Accounting for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Throughout the Supply Chain issued by Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan.

Scope 1:
Direct GHG emissions by sources owned or managed by a company or household (use of fuel: factory, heater, private automobile, etc.)
Scope 2:
Indirect GHG emissions from the use of electricity, steam, or heat (use of purchased electricity, etc.)
Scope 3:
Other indirect emissions besides Scope 2.
("Company" includes the procurement of raw materials, employee business trips, subcontracting of waste disposal, etc.
"Household" includes the purchase of products, travel, subcontracting of waste disposal, etc.)
Scope of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Businesses (conceptual illustration)

2. Initiatives to Reduce Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions

(1) JSR

Since FY2005, we have been striving to upgrade our energy-saving technologies through various approaches, including installing fuel conversion at the Kashima Plant (South Kashima Power Plant, Inc.) and introducing cogeneration facilities and a sludge dryer system at the Yokkaichi Plant. We thus achieved a significant GHG emissions reduction of 21.6% by FY2013 compared to the FY2005 level.

Although we have continued our efforts to conserve energy in the years since FY2013, our emissions have remained about the same.

For this reason, in FY2019, we set a long-term goal of “reducing emissions by 15% in FY2030 compared to the FY2013 level” and are endeavoring to further reduce GHG emissions by introducing highly efficient equipment and using renewable energy in addition to our energy consideration activities.

In FY2019, our emissions fell by 3.2% compared to the FY2013 level, in part due to the volume of production.
We currently identifying risks and opportunities with respect to climate change through scenario analyses and formulating medium- and long-term responses as TCFD-related initiatives.

GHG emissions (kt-CO2)

GHG emissions

Using natural gas as fuel
Reduces CO2 emissions compared to coal- or heavy oil-fired steam boilers and condensing steam turbine systems.

Natural gas-fired turbine cogeneration system (Yokkaichi Plant)

Natural gas-fired turbine cogeneration system (Yokkaichi Plant)

Reduces the amount of combustion support fuel (heavy oil) used in onsite incineration by drying high-water-content sludge that is produced by comprehensive wastewater treatment facilities and using it as fuel.

Sludge dryer system (Yokkaichi Plant)

Sludge dryer system (Yokkaichi Plant)

(2) Head Office

The Tokyo Metropolitan Government requires major tenants of a building occupying 5,000 square meters or more in floor area or consuming six million kWh or more of electricity annually to reduce its CO2 emissions under the Tokyo Metropolitan Ordinance on Environmental Preservation.
Although we are not subject to this obligation, we are promoting energy conservation on our own initiative by voluntarily setting a specific power saving target.
In FY2019, our power consumption fell below the base year average as a result of the main initiatives described below, and we achieved a 15.6% reduction in our emissions compared to the base year average.

Power Saving Target

8% reduction compared to the average power consumption from the base years of FY2009 and FY2010

Major Efforts

  • Policy of turning off lights and office equipment such as printers when not in use.
  • Implemented the so-called "Cool Biz" dress code.
  • Introduced a daylight savings time scheme on two days/week from June to September.
  • Maintained a proper air-conditioned room temperature that achieves a balance between energy savings and operational efficiency.

Power Consumption at the Head Office

Power Consumption at the Head Office

(3) Logistics: Improving Transport Efficiency

As part of our environmental efforts in transportation, we have taken steps to reduce our transport energy use as a designated shipper under the amended Energy Conservation Act. We are working to reduce per-unit transport energy by switching to large-scale transport and making a modal shift from road to rail and water transport.
In FY2019, as a result of policies to transport goods and raw materials by railway and ship, we achieved a modal share of approximately 85%, thus maintaining last year's high level, and successfully held down per-unit transportation energy.

FY 2013 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
CO2 emissions (tons) 22,960 23,333 25,495 24,437 24,208 20,211
Category 4
Transportation and delivery of raw materials and other materials
10,489 12,172 14,133 13,177 13,112 10,706
Category 5
Transportation of waste from plants
164 245 206 195 202 193
Category 9
Transportation and delivery of products
12,307 10,916 11,156 11,065 10,894 9,312
Transport volume (million ton-kilometers*) 492 511 562 534 514 434
Modal shift rate (%) 83 86 87 86 85 85
Energy consumption (kl: crude oil equivalent) 9,026 9,112 9,898 9,899 9,324 7,855
Energy intensity (kl/1,000 t-km) 0.0183 0.0178 0.0176 0.0178 0.0181 0.0181

* The table is slidable aside.

* Ton-kilometer: Freight Tonnage (ton) x Transport Distance (km)

3. JSR Group’s GHG Emissions and Energy Consumption

We also reduced our GHG emissions and energy consumption in FY2019 as a result of lower production volume as well as our various energy conservation activities. (GHG emissions: 6% year-on-year reduction; energy consumption: 7% year-on-year reduction)
Looking globally, we are seeing overseas growth trends attributable to expanding production bases and other factors.
Because our overseas contribution rate is growing, we will address TCFD-related concerns from a global standpoint.

GHG emissions

GHG emissions

Energy consumption

Energy consumption