Home > CSR > Environmental Impact and Resource Reduction, and Climate Change Countermeasures / Environment and Safety (Related Data)

Evaluation by Outside Organizations

Environmental Impact and Resource Reduction, and Climate Change Countermeasures / Environment and Safety (Related Data)

1. Protection of the Atmospheric Environment

(1) Boiler Emissions Countermeasures

At the Yokkaichi Plant, which generates its own power, we installed fuel gas desulfurizers to reduce emissions of sulfur oxides (SOx). We also substantially cut emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) by installing burners with low NOx emissions and denitrification equipment. In FY2014, the fuel conversion (from heavy oil to public utility gas) change implemented at the Kashima Plant (Kashima Joint Power Generator) resulted in a reduction of both SOx and NOx emissions, an achievement that was maintained in FY2016.
JSR will continue to adopt the best emissions reduction technologies, and will continue to make improvements.

SOx Emissions

SOx Emissions

NOx Emissions

NOx Emissions

(2) Initiatives for the Reduction of VOCs*1 Emissions into the Atmosphere

Having set a high voluntary goal for the reduction of emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by 75% from FY2001 levels, JSR undertook large-scale investment between FY2007 and FY2010 to install five dried-synthetic rubber waste incinerators in three plants. We also carried out meticulous maintenance and management activities, including enhancing the airtightness of release points, improving the working method by adopting a closed system for chemical sampling and preventing leakage from bulbs. As a result, our VOCs emissions in FY2016 were 971 tons (77% reduction as compared to FY2001), in so doing, we reached our internal target. As we ramp up our production volume, we will maintain the level of the current voluntary goal (75% reduction from FY2001) without large-scale investment by ensuring the proper operation of dried-synthetic rubber waste incinerators and finely tuned maintenance and management.

*1 VOCs = Volatile Organic Compounds.

Reference: VOCs reduction targets

  • (1) Air Pollution Control Act (enforced in April 2006): To achieve a 30% reduction in the amount of VOCs released into the atmosphere from the FY2001 level by FY2011 with the effective application of laws and regulations, along with operators' independent activities.
  • (2) Japan Chemical Industry Association: To prevent any further negative impact over FY2011 levels by FY2016.

Acrylonitrile

Acrylonitrile

1,3-Butadiene

1,3-Butadiene

Dichloromethane

Dichloromethane

Styrene

Styrene

Toluene

Toluene

VOCs Emissions

VOCs Emissions

(3) Measurement of Ozone-depleting Substances

As part of compliance with the Freon Emission Reduction Act established in April of 2015, all businesses that use designated products, including industrial air conditioners, refrigerators, and freezers, must perform basic inspections, periodic maintenance, and create inspection records. A total annual leakage of 1,000 t or more of CO2 must be reported to the acting minister.
For this reason, JSR has created management standards for devices that use freon and has mandated a policy that such devices be managed in accordance with these standards. The amount of freon leakage in FY2016 was 252 t of CO2.

2. PRTR Support

(1) PRTR*2 Activities

Based on the Act on Confirmation, etc. of Release Amounts of Specific Chemical Substances in the Environment and Promotion of Improvements to the Management Thereof, JSR aggregates the amount of designated chemical substances emitted into the environment (atmosphere, water and soil), transferred by manufacturing, or used in the previous year, and notifies the government of Japan of the results. We have systematically implemented a range of measures primarily for substances that are emitted in significant amounts and have a great impact on the environment. Such measures include enhancing the airtightness of substance release sources, rendering substances harmless by incineration, and improving manufacturing processes. In FY2016, as a result of taking such measures, we reduced emissions of the substances designated by the PRTR (287 tons) by 89% from the FY1996 level.

*2 Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers (PRTR): A system for registering the emission and transport of environmental pollutants
Outline of PRTR is shown in Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry web site ;
http://www.meti.go.jp/policy/chemical_management/english/prtr.html

(2) Amounts of pollutants emitted and transferred in FY2016 and PRTR atmospheric emissions

Amounts of Pollutants Emitted and Transferred in FY2016 (tons/year)

(Including Techno Polymer Co., Ltd. KRATON JSR ELASTOMERS K.K. Japan Butyl Co., Ltd. Kashima Plant)

Amounts of Pollutants Emitted and Transferred in FY2016

Amounts of Atmospheric Emissions of PRTR Applicable Substances

Amounts of Atmospheric Emissions of PRTR Applicable Substances

FY2016 Emissions of Chemical Substances (PRTR)

Ordinance designated number Substance Amounts handled*3
(t)
Atmospheric emissions
(t)
Water discharged
(t)
Transfers*4
(t)
1 Zinc compounds (water-soluble) 1.4 0.0 1.4 0.0
2 Acrylamide 97.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
4 Acrylic acid and its water-soluble salts 1,353.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
7 n-Butyl acrylate 2,011.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
9 Acrylonitrile 42,267.6 14.3 0.0 0.0
13 Acetonitrile 132.1 0.1 0.5 9.1
20 2-Aminoethanol 5.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
28 Allyl alcohol 4.8 0.0 0.0 4.8
30 n-Alkylbenzensulfonic acid and its salts (limited to those with 10 to 14 alkyl group carbons and their mixtures) 1,128.9 0.0 0.0 0.0
36 Isoprene 80,704.4 0.7 0.0 5.2
71 Ferric chloride 19.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
80 Xylene 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
83 Cumene 32.3 0.2 0.0 0.0
86 Cresol 5.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
150 1,4-Dioxane 3.0 0.0 0.0 2.6
186 Dichloromethane 20.7 1.6 0.0 2.5
190 Dicyclopentadiene 12,902.5 0.1 0.0 28.6
202 Divinylbenzene 30.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
203 Diphenylamine 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
207 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-cresol 759.6 3.3 0.0 15.7
220 Water-soluble salts of dimethyldithiocarbamic acid 81.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
230 N-(1,3-dimethylbutyl)-N'-phenyl-p-phenylenediamine 256.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
234 Bromine 2,110.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
240 Styrene 125,670.1 29.1 0.0 0.8
274 Tert-dodecanethiol 951.5 0.1 0.0 0.0
276 3, 6, 9-triazaundecane-1, 11-diamine (also known as tetraethylenepentamine) 9.6 0.0 0.0 1.0
300 Toluene 2,913.5 62.4 0.2 243.2
309 Nickel compounds 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0
321 Vanadium compounds 42.7 0.0 0.0 42.1
330 Bis (1-methyl-1-phenylethyl) peroxide 14.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
337 4-Vinyl-1-cyclohexene 91.8 0.0 0.0 0.5
351 1, 3-Butadiene 560,906.6 10.3 0.0 0.9
355 Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 35.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
366 Tert-butyl hydroperoxide 8.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
392 n-Hexane 1,222.0 161.1 0.0 71.7
395 Water-soluble salts of peroxodisulfuric acid 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
411 Formaldehyde 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
415 Methacrylic acid 62.7 0.0 0.0 0.1
417 2, 3-Epoxypropyl methacrylate 8.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
420 Methyl methacrylate 5,187.3 2.0 0.0 0.0
436 α-Methylstyrene 9,741.7 1.7 0.0 0.0
440 1- Methyl-1-phenylethyl hydroperoxide 198.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
448 Methylenebis (4,1-phenylene) = diisocyanate (MDI) 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
  Total 851,004.0 287.0 2.1 428.8
243 Polychlorinated-dibenzo-p-dioxins*5 - 0.0313 0.0003 0.0000

*3 The handling amount represents the value after base deduction (1 ton/year per place of business)

*4 The transfer amount is the amount committed to intermediate waste service companies plus the amount discharged into public sewers

*5 Dioxin category unit: mg-TEQ

3. Preservation of Water Quality

JSR performs rigorous wastewater management at all of its plants, and strives to maintain and improve water quality. JSR is in full compliance with the 7th Total Pollutant Load Control that was put into operation in April 2012. We will continue to strictly monitor water quality and strive to further reduce our impact on water.

Total amount of waste water

Total amount of waste water

Chemical Oxygen Demand Emissions

Chemical Oxygen Demand Emissions

Total Nitrogen Emissions

Total Nitrogen Emissions

Total Phosphorus Emissions

Total Phosphorus Emissions

4. Assessment of Soil and Groundwater Pollution

Groundwater (Environmental Quality Standards for Groundwater Pollution) and soil (major items regulated under environmental standards) at all three of our plants are periodically inspected. As in previous years, no problems were found in FY2016.

5. Asbestos Measures

In accordance with the Ordinance on Prevention of Hazards due to Asbestos, JSR has conducted checks at all of its facilities (office, manufacturing, R&D and employee amenity areas), including those of all Group companies, where asbestos containing materials have been sprayed. Subsequently, at locations in plants where asbestos was found, we completed removal and enclosure projects in FY2007. In addition, we are investigating the replacement of asbestos containing gaskets with non-asbestos containing types and are progressively carrying out replacements when the safety of their use in production has been confirmed.
We will continue to act properly to prevent workers engaged in building demolition work from acquiring health problems caused by asbestos exposure in accordance with air pollution prevention laws and asbestos disability prevention regulations.
In order to accommodate requests from the Labour Standards Bureau of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare to thoroughly inform our employees of various systems, including the issuance of the asbestos-related health care handbook and the provision of special benefits as industrial workers' compensation for bereaved families, we introduced the relevant leaflet released by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare on our website.

6. PCB Management

JSR stores and manages PCB waste in an appropriate manner in accordance with the "Act on Special Measures concerning Promotion of Proper Treatment of PCB Wastes" and subsequently carries out detoxication treatment in accordance with the law.

Electrical devices Number of devices Oil containing PCB (liter)
Devices in storage (not in use) 33 40,401
Devices in operation 0 0
Total 33 40,401
Total number of devices treated
Current treatment status (%)
276
(89.3)
144,532
(78.2)

As of March 31, 2016

7. Environmental Accounting

  • Policy

    JSR introduced environmental accounting in FY2000 with the following two objectives

    1. To strive to quantify the amount of resources invested into the environment and implement sound measures for the environment.
    2. To publish environmental accounting and increase corporate transparency.
  • Scope

    JSR Corporation - JSR Head Office, Yokkaichi Plant, Chiba Plant, Kashima Plant and Research Laboratories

  • Target Period

    Wednesday, April 01, 2015 - Thursday, March 31, 2016

  • Underlying Assumptions regarding Aggregation and Calculation

    1. Calculations are performed in accordance with the Environmental Accounting Guidelines, 2005 edition (Ministry of the Environment) and environmental guidelines used in the chemical industry (issued by the Japan Chemical Industry Association and the Japan Responsible Care Council).
    2. While the calculation of costs was based mainly on actual results, the calculation of some expenses was based on underlying assumptions.
    3. Economic effects were substantial and did not include conversions of risk aversion effects or deemed effects into monetary amounts.

    * Units of one million yen
    * Abbreviations - YP: Yokkaichi Plant, KP: Kashima Plant, CP: Chiba Plant

(1) Environmental Protection Costs

(Unit: one million yen)
Category Investment*6 Expense
FY2015 FY2016 FY2015 FY2016

(1) Business area costs

396 549 4,787 4,540
Breakdown (1) -1
Pollution prevention costs
330 302

Investments:
YP: Bag filter cloth replacement for boiler #6 (80), Updated infrastructure for waste water treatment facilities (147). Tsukuba Research Center: Above-ground piping for research drainage (30)

1,963 1,866

Expenses:
YP: Air pollution prevention (670), water pollution prevention (297), odor control (230). KP: Water pollution prevention (350)

(1) -2
Global environmental protection costs
44 157

Investments:
YP: Energy conservation costs due to self-generation of power (146)

1,155 1,014

Expenses:
YP: Energy conservation due to self-generation of power (880), global warming prevention and energy conservation (99). CP Costs: Global warming prevention and energy conservation (29)

(1) -3
Resource circulation costs
22 90

Investments:
YP: Bag filter replacement for sludge drying equipment, ash treatment facility updates (90)

1,669 1,660

Expenses:
YP: Industrial waste recycling (366), Treatment/disposal of industrial waste (751). Head Office: Industrial waste recycling (164). KP: Treatment/disposal of industrial waste (156)

(2) Upstream/downstream costs

0 0 0 0

(3) Management activity costs

17 6

Investments:
Preparation of green areas (4)

490 493

Expenses:
YP: Environmental impact monitoring (78), ISO14001 certification maintenance/operation (55), Labor (69). CP: Environmental improvement activities (34)

(4) Research and development costs

0 0 1,636 1,550

Expenses:
Development of environmentally friendly products (1,365), environmental impact analysis and tests for legal applications (182)

(5) Social activity costs

0 0 48 43

Expenses:
YP: Amaike pump maintenance costs (16). Head Office: Support for the International Center for Environmental Technology Transfer (ICETT) (17), organizational charges (7)

Total 413 555 6,961 6,626

*6 Refers to the amount of the orders placed

(2) Environmental Protection Effects

Effect Index Unit FY2015 FY2016 Difference*7 Related information
Environmental effects related to resources used in business activities Total energy consumption (crude oil equivalent) kL 265,400 268,100 2,700 For more information
Use of resources designated under PRTR Act tons 865,430 835,961 -11,469 For more information
Water consumption 1,000m3 14,900 14,600 -300 For more information
Environmental protection effects related to environmental impact and waste emitted from business activities CO2 emissions tons 658,600 650,900 -7,700 For more information
SOx emissions tons 5 4 -1 For more information
NOx emissions tons 322 342 20 For more information
PRTR substance emissions tons 262 287 25 For more information
Total amount of waste water 1,000m3 11,974 11,755 -219 For more information
Chemical Oxygen Demand emissions tons 445 444 -1 For more information
Total nitrogen emissions tons 124 148 24 For more information
Total phosphorus emissions tons 0.3 0.4 0.1 For more information
Waste materials from plants tons 25,803 23,874 -1,929 For more information
Off-site recycling tons 24,154 23,548 -606 For more information
Reduced volume of waste treated off-site tons 1,649 326 -1,323 For more information
Waste materials from plants disposed of by landfill tons 0 0 0 For more information
PRTR materials transported tons 330 430 100 For more information
Other environmental effects Products transported million ton-kilometer 523 511 -12 For more information
During transport CO2 emissions tons 23,984 23,333 -651 For more information
Number of environmental complaints (Odor, noise, and vibration) cases 0 0 0 For more information

*7 Improvement from previous years has not been corrected in terms of the production volume.

(3) Economical Effects of Environmental Protection Measures*8 -Substantial Effect-

(Unit: million yen)
Effect (for one year) Benefit
FY2015 FY2016
Cost reduction By saving energy 202 33
By saving resources 285 46
By treating waste on-site 534 475
Total 1,021 554

*8 The economic effects of energy and resource saving compared to the previous year.

(4) Consolidated Accounting

(Unit: one million yen)
Investments Expense Benefit
FY2015 FY2016 FY2015 FY2016 FY2015 FY2016
JSR 412 555 6,961 6,626 1,021 554
Total of 14 Group companies 557 99 2,315 2,422 435 509
Total 969 654 9,276 9,048 1,456 1,063

(5) Development of New Environmental Protection Technologies

Amount of Capital Investment

1. Amount of Capital Investment

JSR makes continuous investments in the environment and safety. Investments made in FY2016 reached 4.0 billion yen. This consisted of plant and facility investment aimed at various environmental improvements such as energy-saving equipment, and safety improvements such as workplace accident prevention. JSR will continue to make ambitious investments to maintain and improve the environmental, safety, and health aspects of operations in accordance with its medium-term capital investment plan.

2. Main Areas of Environmental & Safety Capital Investment (Year in parentheses represents the investment year)

  • Large-scale, natural gas-fired turbine cogeneration system (FY2010)
  • Full-scale anti-seismic measures for facilities (FY1996-2015)
  • Ground flare installation (FY2000, FY2008)
  • Renovation of sludge dehydrator and upgrading efficiency (FY2001)
  • Facilities to reduce hazardous atmospheric pollutants (FY1999-2008)
    (Dichloromethane solvent recovery facilities, 1,3-Butadiene treatment facility, incinerators for dry synthetic rubber dry exhaust, etc.)
  • Augmented comprehensive facilities to treat wastewater (FY2006, FY2008)
  • Sludge dryer system (FY2013)

3. Development of New Environmental Protection Technologies

Led by its Process Development Center, JSR is actively engaged in the development of new technologies to promote environmental protection. The following are recent themes in technological development approached by JSR. We deploy technologies as they are developed.

4. Main Areas of Environmental & Safety Technology Development

  • (1) Development of Energy-saving Processes
    • Computer-assisted optimization of heat recovery (pinch technology)
    • Computer-assisted optimization of energy use in control systems
    • Energy-saving through changes in heat recovery and solvent types across multiple plants
  • (2) Other Technologies to Reduce Environmental Impact
    • Development of solution polymerization manufacturing facilities and a new solvent recovery process (to reduce hydrocarbon emissions into the atmosphere)
    • Development of synthetic rubber manufacturing facilities and dry exhaust systems (to reduce odors near plants and hydrocarbon emissions into the atmosphere)
    • Development of polymerization technologies to combat total nitrogen emissions (measures to prevent eutrophication of ocean waters)
    • Development of environmental technology through more effective use of microbes (to reduce odors near plants and to improve the quality of wastewater)
    • Incineration technology for dry synthetic rubber dry exhaust (measures for harmful atmospheric pollutants)
    • Installation of a sludge dryer system (to reduce CO2 emissions and promote effective utilization of waste)

8. Improving the Local Environment

Dried-synthetic rubber waste incinerator (Kashima Plant)

Dried-synthetic rubber waste incinerator (Kashima Plant)

JSR values the opinions of local residents and considers high transparency of plant operations to be the key to improve the local environment. With this in mind, we have strived to improve the local environment by implementing monitoring and tours of environmental equipment at regular intervals. In FY2007 and FY2008, we installed equipment to incinerate dry synthetic rubber dry exhaust (RTO*9) at the Yokkaichi, Kashima, and Chiba plants to prevent foul odors. In FY2009, a ground flare was installed at the Yokkaichi Plant to prevent noise and flashes. As a result, there have been no environmental complaints from FY2009 to FY2016.
We will continue striving to maintain our basic policy of improving the local environment.

*9 RTO (Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer): A device that combusts breaks down VOCs into water and CO2 to make emissions clear

Number of environmental complaints

Number of environmental complaints
Ground flare (Yokkaichi Plant)

Ground flare (Yokkaichi Plant)

9. Other

* Only Japanese version available.

(1) Maintenance management information regarding waste treatment facilities (Yokkaichi Plant)

1. Maintenance management information

2. Periodic inspection notifications

  • Incinerator #1 (primary reactor) Industrial Waste (PDF 272KB)
  • Incinerator #2 (Fluidized bed incinerator #1) Industrial Waste (PDF 260KB)
  • Incinerator #4 (Fluidized bed incinerator #2) Industrial Waste (PDF 259KB)
  • General Waste (PDF 263KB)

3. Licensing

  • Industrial Waste Disposal Permits (PDF 313KB)
  • Special Control Industrial Waste Disposal Permits (PDF 369KB)
  • Specific Waste Treatment Facilities License (PDF 911KB)

(2) By-product Reduction Plan Based on Laws Promoting the Effective Use of Resources

  • By-product Reduction Plan Based on Laws Promoting the Effective Use of Resources (PDF 15.4KB)
Get Adobe Reader
This information is provided in PDF files. Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view these documents. Use this link to download Adobe Reader.
TOP